Select Page

Step 1. Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Step 2. Make Payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Step 3. Receive your paper

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Weekly reading journals are designed to encourage critical reflection on your re

by | Jun 22, 2022 | Literature | 0 comments


Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Weekly reading journals are designed to encourage critical reflection on your reading and writing practices. Since this course examines the ways in which literacy practices reflect and shape worldview and our sense of identity and belonging, reflecting on your reading and writing practices presents an opportunity to reflect, also, on how you approach problem-framing and problem-solving, participation in civil discourse, and participation in the linguistic or discursive life of the communities you belong to.
For this reading journal, please answer the questions below in a minimum of 400 words.
Select one short story from this week’s reading and perform steps 1-5 of the CRIT process: Paraphrase, Observe, Contextualize, Analyze, and Argue.
Compare and contrast the central ideas of Washington’s “Atlanta Compromise” speech and DuBois’ “Of Our Spiritual Striving.” Select a representative passage from each and describe how the form (syntax, diction, figurative language, tone, etc.) relates to the work’s central idea. In other words, to what extent does each author/speaker perform his meaning through language and style?
Finally, what enduring questions do you have about close reading and literary analysis using the CRIT method? What additional resources can your professor and/or TA provide to help clarify the process for you?
Weekly Journals Rubric (Specs)
Weekly Journals Rubric (Specs)
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement with Reading/Literacy and/or Reflective Learning Strategies
Meets Standard
Student demonstrates some engagement with effective reading strategies and develops original readings of the texts. Student reflects on prior knowledge, learning, and/or experiences and draws connections between that prior knowledge and the new knowledge presented in the reading and/or student demonstrates new insights regarding prior texts of the course based on the new material presented.
Standard Not Yet Demonstrated
Journal demonstrates reading without effective strategies, incomplete or unoriginal readings (relying heavily on authority or outside sources), plagiarism, and/or has not yet submitted journal.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment of Ideas
Meets Standard
Student fully develops responses with clarifying details and supporting evidence from the readings. Student consciously prioritizes issues and information based on the question or problem under discussion; articulates well-founded support for highlighting or emphasizing a particular concept, solution, or answer while objectively considering other viable options; draws conclusion based on evaluation of various positions.
Standard Not Yet Demonstrated
Journal not yet submitted, evidence of plagiarism, or student demonstrates any of the following: jumping to conclusions without identifying assumptions, logical connections, and/or the through-line of thought process; stacking up supporting evidence while ignoring contradictory information; confusing evidence and unsupported personal opinion; failing to break down problem or concept in order to acknowledge multiple perspectives; viewing experts as being opinionated or as trying to subject others to their personal beliefs; failing to address uncertainties or ambiguities related to the problem, concept, or question under discussion; recasting an open-ended problem to one having a single “correct” answer; insisting that the experts should provide the correct answer; expresses confusion or futility; using illogical arguments; not evaluating or appropriately applying evidence; inappropriately citing “facts” or definitions without extrapolating conceptual frameworks to address the issue; and/or drawing conclusions based on unexamined authorities’ views or what “feels right.”
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Ideas
Meets Standard
Student’s response demonstrates reflection on audience understanding and attention to connections among ideas through structure, transitions, and word choice.
Standard Not Yet Demonstrated
Work not yet submitted, evidence of plagiarism, or response leads to audience misunderstanding due to structural, grammatical, or mechanical confusion.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now


We encrypt everything. It’s all confidential.

Secure Payment

Sleep tight: each transaction is encrypted and 100% secure.

Ready to get started?