Select Page

Step 1. Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Step 2. Make Payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Step 3. Receive your paper

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Topic: Discuss the symbolism that advances the story’s or the play’s development

by | Jun 22, 2022 | Engineering | 0 comments

 

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Topic:
Discuss the symbolism that advances the story’s or the play’s development. Base your essay one or two of the readings above.
Resources:
Remember: Formal papers go beyond the personal experience perspective of the discussion board postings. Formal papers must demonstrate objectivity supported by the readings themselves not our own personal experience.
In addition, a key element for success in writing the papers is the ability to avoid summary and concentrate on analysis. This University of North Carolina handout includes key points in differences in summary and analysis and strategies for focusing on analysis.
Guidelines:
Minimum length: 500 words. Maximum length: 700 words.
Formal papers are polished essays designed to demonstrate understanding of the genre we are studying. Formal papers must be well organized, and they must clearly support an arguable and provable thesis. The thesis should be a clear and specific statement (1 explicit sentence) within a fully developed introduction.
Specific and relevant details should be included within each body paragraph in order to prove your thesis.
Clarity is a must, and papers must focus on literary analysis and interpretation–no plot summary. See link included above in “Resources”.
At least 3 in-text citations are required, along with a complete Works Cited page in MLA format. Omitting the citations and/or the Works Cited page will automatically drop the grade by a letter.
One of the 3 or more in-text citations must be from a secondary source.
No more than 10% of the total paper should be quoted material; otherwise, it’s plot summary. The majority of the paper should be analysis.
The paper should consist of at least 5 paragraphs, and all paragraphs should be approximately the same length … this includes the introduction and conclusion.
Formal papers must be written in 3rd person–(he, she, it, the reader, etc.), no 1st person (I, we, me, us) or 2nd person (you).
Grammar, sentence structure, and precise word choice all factor into the final grade, so proofread and edit carefully.
MLA format is required. This includes a proper four-line heading, spacing (double-spaced throughout).
Writing Rubric (1)
Writing Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
40 pts
Excellent
• Excels in responding to assignment, and demonstrates mastery of course concepts and materials • Thesis presents a clear, focused, and compelling argument • Paper recognizes the complexities of its argument throughout the analysis
32 pts
Proficient
• Responds appropriately to the assignment, demonstrates clear understanding of course concepts and materials • Good argument, clearly articulated in thesis, though might need refining • Begins to acknowledge the complexities of its argument
28 pts
Needs Improvement
• Doesn’t fully respond to the assignment, demonstrates some misunderstanding of course concepts and materials • Paper has a weak argument, thesis is too general • Fails to acknowledge other views
24 pts
Ineffective/Weak
• Doesn’t respond appropriately to the assignment, disconnected from course concepts and materials • Argument is unclear, thesis is weak • Thesis too vague or general to be nuanced or complicated
0 pts
No Marks
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence & Support
40 pts
Excellent
• Argument is thoroughly supported by strong, specific, and appropriate evidence • Evidence is clearly introduced, analyzed and connected to the argument
32 pts
Proficient
• Paper’s argument is supported by relevant evidence, though not always the strongest or specific quotations • Analysis of evidence needs further development
28 pts
Needs Improvement
• Paper’s argument is supported by limited evidence that is only occasionally relevant • Connections between argument and evidence are somewhat unclear
24 pts
Ineffective/Weak
• Evidence is insufficient, misconstrued or misrepresented • Unclear connections between evidence and argument
0 pts
No Marks
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure
40 pts
Excellent
• Paper flows logically to craft a cohesive argument • Paragraphs clearly guide the reader through a progression of ideas • Uses transitional sentences to develop strong relationships between ideas
32 pts
Proficient
• Generally well-constructed flow of ideas • Paragraphs are ordered thoughtfully, each paragraph relates to central argument • Transitional sentences create a logical progression of ideas
28 pts
Needs Improvement
• Paper jumps from one idea to the next, lacking a clear structure • Occasional connection of ideas between paragraphs • Simple sequential rather than transitions based on logic
24 pts
Ineffective/Weak
• Paper wanders from one idea to the next, making it difficult to distill the argument • Limited connection of ideas between paragraphs • Paragraphs may lack topic sentences or connection of ideas
0 pts
No Marks
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle
40 pts
Excellent
• Displays a unique critical voice • Style fits the paper’s audience • Chooses words carefully, for their precise meaning • Demonstrates thorough and thoughtful editing and revision
32 pts
Proficient
• Displays a clear critical voice • Style is conscious of paper’s audience • Uses words effectively, if too generally at times • Demonstrates revision and editing
28 pts
Needs Improvement
• Displays a critical voice that is generic or bland • Style only occasionally displays awareness of paper’s audience • Sentence structure and word choice frequently too unfocused, wordy or confusing • Minor revisions and editing
24 pts
Ineffective/Weak
• Critical voice is unclear • Style isn’t appropriate for paper’s audience • Simple, awkward, or monotonous sentence structure and word choices • Minimal revisions and editing
0 pts
No Marks
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics & Citations
40 pts
Excellent
• Almost entirely free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors • All sources are cited correctly and completely
32 pts
Proficient
• May contain a few spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors, but they don’t impede understanding • Sources cited correctly and completely
28 pts
Needs Improvement
• Several spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors that distract the reader • Minor citation errors
24 pts
Ineffective/Weak
• Contains many spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors • Incomplete citations
0 pts
No Marks
40 pts
Total Points: 200

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Confidentiality

We encrypt everything. It’s all confidential.

Secure Payment

Sleep tight: each transaction is encrypted and 100% secure.

Ready to get started?