Select Page

Step 1. Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Step 2. Make Payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Step 3. Receive your paper

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

CHOOSE 2 OF THE EPISTEMOLOGIES TO COMPARE AND CONTRAST TO YOUR BELIEF/VALUE. Pap

by | Jun 21, 2022 | Philosophy | 0 comments

 

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

CHOOSE 2 OF THE EPISTEMOLOGIES TO COMPARE AND CONTRAST TO YOUR BELIEF/VALUE.
Paper 3 Description: Descartes, Locke, Hobbes & Berkeley
This paper is designed for you to explore the connections between two of the following philosophical epistemologies, and the knowledge framework of your belief.
Rene Descartes – Program of Systematic Doubt employed so as to find certainty in knowledge. Problem of Interactionism – mind/matter distinction.
Thomas Hobbes – (Materialist) ‘All that exists is bodies in motion.’ Political and Natural philosophy. State of nature vs. social contract
John Locke – Representative Realism highlights an object as having primary and secondary qualities. Tabula rasa – blank slate ‘We have nothing in our minds that we did not first experience.’
George Berkeley – ‘All objects are ideas.’ There are no primary qualities of an object, they are essentially all secondary.
These are the directions for the paper:
Compare and contrast two Epistemologies from the following list of philosophers.
Rene Descartes
Thomas Hobbes
John Locke
George Berkeley
Then draw a conclusion as to which one of these two Epistemologies is most comparable to your own belief system. What are the connections between your ideas and your selected philosopher?
It will be useful to think about what type of philosopher you have chosen. For example, is your ‘thinker’ an Empiricist, or a Rationalist? Does he maintain belief in universal truths, or those pertaining to mere experience accenting the ever changing qualities of the individual and the real world?
Does the materialist point of view hinder any advancement toward understanding ‘free will’? For example, if one believes that individuals are simply ‘matter’ and not ‘mind’, then are we only subject to the laws of physics? What does this imply? We are purely mechanical, with no ability to chose otherwise?

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Confidentiality

We encrypt everything. It’s all confidential.

Secure Payment

Sleep tight: each transaction is encrypted and 100% secure.

Ready to get started?